> Sign in
 
E-JOURNAL RESEARCH NETWORK PAPER DATABASE NEWS

Sapienza - Università di Roma
Università Politecnica delle Marche
NEWS
20 october 2016
22 august 2016
22 july 2016
19 april 2016
09 february 2016
16 december 2015
03 july 2015
25 february 2015
09 february 2015
13 november 2014
13 november 2014
08 october 2014
19 september 2014
22 january 2014
27 august 2013
27 august 2013
19 july 2013
19 july 2013
02 july 2013
26 june 2013
25 june 2013
25 june 2013
03 may 2013
03 may 2013
03 april 2013
03 april 2013
08 march 2013
08 march 2013
06 february 2013
06 february 2013
25 january 2013
14 january 2013
04 january 2013
07 december 2012
07 december 2012
26 november 2012
22 november 2012
22 november 2012
02 november 2012
15 october 2012
11 october 2012
10 october 2012
01 october 2012
20 september 2012
10 september 2012
07 september 2012
03 september 2012
03 september 2012
29 august 2012
22 august 2012
22 august 2012
27 july 2012
17 july 2012
16 july 2012
11 july 2012
05 july 2012
27 june 2012
27 june 2012
18 june 2012
12 june 2012
05 june 2012
26 may 2012
26 may 2012
16 may 2012
14 may 2012
07 may 2012
30 april 2012
20 april 2012
20 april 2012
11 april 2012
11 april 2012
27 march 2012
27 march 2012
27 march 2012
01 march 2012
12 march 2010
12 march 2010
25 may 2009
25 january 2013

Will France Give Up Its Role as a Nuclear Powerhouse?

A council appointed by French President François Hollande is kicking off a government-sponsored nationwide debate that could shift France’s energy system from nuclear to renewable energy. It is a dramatic development in light of France’s outsized investment in nuclear energy: the country produces more nuclear energy than any country other than the United States, and it relies on reactors for more than three-quarters of its power generation, a higher rate than any other country.


In the short term, energy experts expect limited impact within France and in the global market. Given its heavy reliance on nuclear power, the country cannot rapidly phase out its reactors the way Germany plans to. And the country, once viewed as the model for a U.S. nuclear renaissance, has lost its leadership role to global competitors. “The new leaders in nuclear expansion globally are the Chinese and Koreans,” says Andrew Kadak, a professor of nuclear science and engineering at MIT. Over the long haul, however, experts such as Kadak predict that a future France that abandons nuclear would impoverish global nuclear R&D.

During his election campaign last year, Hollande called to reduce nuclear to 50 percent of France’s power supply by 2025. If the national debate affirms a reduction of that magnitude, the new reactor in Normandy that state-owned utility Electricité de France (EDF) expects to fire up in 2016 could be its last.

“France’s reduced backing for nuclear will certainly be a blow to nuclear power’s reputation,” says Chi-Jen Yang, an expert in technology policy at Duke University’s Center on Global Change. However, Yang, Kadak, and other experts agree that the big loser will be France, which is likely to experience a reduced capacity to export its own technology: the third-generation European Pressurized Reactor design developed by French nuclear technology firm Areva —the same design that EDF is using.

Areva is building a nuclear plant with the new design in Finland and bidding globally to build more, including a second unit for Finland. EDF is building two such plants in China and has proposed deploying the technology in power plant projects in the United States and the United Kingdom, among other countries.

The French are struggling to build on this foothold in China’s burgeoning nuclear market. Yang says the French may have already lost the Chinese market to Westinghouse and its third-generation AP1000 reactor, four of which are under construction in China. Whereas Westinghouse agreed several years ago to share its technology with its Chinese partners, the French have yet to do so.

If France’s role in the reactor market is already slipping, experts say, France remains a major player in the development of advanced nuclear technologies that will be relevant in the decades to come. The Commissariat à l’énergie atomique—France’s counterpart to the U.S. Department of Energy—has been spending about 1.5 billion euros ($2 billion) annually on R&D into “nuclear technologies of the future.” That dwarfs the $885 million that Congress provided for the DOE’s nuclear energy R&D in 2011.

The results of that investment includes competencies that could be lost if France pulls back from nuclear energy broadly. Kadak cites their capacity to industrialize spent-fuel reprocessing technology that the world may ultimately need to manage nuclear waste. “This is an area where the French are clearly leaders,” says Kadak. If the French retrench, reprocessing development will “suffer globally and will affect our ability to recycle nuclear fuel.”

Burton Richter, a Nobel Prize-winning physicist at Stanford University and former board member for Areva’s U.S. subsidiary, says France’s energy agency has been “more effective than the U.S. labs” in developing so-called Generation IV reactors. These advanced reactors can “breed” their own fuel by irradiating and transmutating unenriched uranium. Other designs can break down spent nuclear fuel.

France’s energy debate is scheduled to wrap up this July, and the government is then expected to draft and propose legislation in October. Anti-nuclear activists say public opinion is with them, citing a poll commissioned by Greenpeace last year in which 80 percent endorsed the statement that “France is too dependent on nuclear energy.”

Nuclear proponents retort that the debate could recommit France to nuclear energy, citing growing worries over jobs. Then there’s French automakers’ embrace of electric vehicle technology, which will be hard to charge with low-carbon energy without France’s reactors.

“The French establishment is looking at whether they can electrify transportation and the rest of industry, which would imply a massive increase in electricity demand,” notes Charles Forsberg, an MIT research scientist and executive director of the MIT Nuclear Fuel Cycle Project.

Both nuclear power and renewables could emerge as winners, says Forsberg: “At the end of the day, the French will likely have slow nuclear and accelerated renewables growth.”


Article by MIT Technology Review 
 
built with Fastportal3 by FASTNET S.p.A.